4Th Amendment Money Laundering Directive - Beneficial ownership in the spotlight - 2 Bedford Row - Criminal Barristers Chambers money laundering uae

4Th Amendment Money Laundering Directive – Beneficial ownership in the spotlight – 2 Bedford Row – Criminal Barristers Chambers money laundering uae

On 5 february 2013 the european commission published their proposals (2013/0025 (COD)) for a fourth amendment to the european directive in relation to money laundering (directive 2005/60/EC of 26 october 2005). One of the key proposals relates to the collection by member states of information identifying the beneficial ownership of companies. Whilst laudable in theory, the practical implementation of such a scheme has provoked much debate.

A register of beneficial ownership was quietly moved up the UK’s legislative agenda when the queen addressed parliament on 4 june 2014, although it appeared without reference to the directive or money laundering, and buried amongst a host of other business related proposals. The queen’s announcement of the small business, enterprise and employment bill was as follows:

“new legislation will require ministers to set and report on a deregulation target for each parliament.Money laundering uae the legislation will also reduce delays in employment tribunals, improve the fairness of contracts for low paid workers and establish a public register of company beneficial ownership. Legislation will be introduced to provide for a new statutory code and an adjudicator to increase fairness for public house tenants.”

On 13th june 2014 the council of the EU provided an updated presidency compromise” on the commission’s proposed 4th money laundering directive. This provided:

With a view to enhancing transparency, beneficial ownership information should be stored in specified locations, for example in the case of companies in a public central company registry, or data retrieval systems, satisfying strict criteria of timely and unrestricted access to the information stored. In order to ensure a level playing field among different types of legal form, trustees should also be required to obtain, hold and provide to obliged entities taking customer due diligence measures, beneficial ownership information and to communicate this information to the specified locations or data retrieval systems and they should declare their status to obliged entities.Money laundering uae legal entities such as foundations and legal arrangements similar to trusts should be subject to equivalent requirements.”

Purpose

The proposals of the 4th anti-money laundering directive (4AMLD) are designed to bring further cohesion and cooperation across the EU to help prevent and reduce the ease with which criminals use company and trust structures to launder their illegitimate gains. The vast majority of businesses and their directors may not be concerned about this or may believe that it has little impact on their day to day trading. However the changes proposed are likely to add further levels of scrutiny and in relation to beneficial ownership, public scrutiny, which may well be unwelcome, albeit for honest and proper reasons.

Key proposals

Of immediate importance to companies will be the requirement for member states to ensure that corporate entities obtain and hold current and accurate information of their beneficial ownership (article 29(1)).Money laundering uae member states must also ensure that this information is readily accessible by the relevant authorities such as police, HMRC and the NCA (article 29(2)).

It had been generally considered previously that the register would simply need to be accessible by the various government agencies, however the public status of the database is highlighted by the recent announcements by the queen and the EU council.

Beneficial ownership is defined by article 3(5) as:

“any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the customer and/or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted. The beneficial owner shall at least include:

In the case of corporate entities:

The natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership or control over a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights in that legal entity, including through bearer share holdings, other than a company listed on a regulated market that is subject to disclosure requirements consistent with european union legislation or subject to equivalent international standards.Money laundering uae

A percentage of 25% plus one share shall be evidence of ownership or control through shareholding and applies to every level of direct and indirect ownership;

If there is any doubt that the person(s) identified in point (i) are the beneficial owner(s), the natural person(s) who exercises control over the management of a legal entity through other means.”

The definition of beneficial ownership requires careful thought by corporate entities especially during the formation process. If there is any doubt over the beneficial ownership then it would appear that the corporate entity or the state in relation to any public register, must consider who exercises control. This is likely to have tax implications because it may be in circumstances where there is uncertainty the answer determined as to beneficial ownership may differ from the intention of the owners or shareholders themselves.Money laundering uae

Article 10 introduces a reduction in the limit to cash transactions where due diligence must be carried out. The limit previously applied was 15,000 euro but the proposal is to reduce this to 7,500 euro applicable to the trade of goods on an occasional basis. This may not prove to be too onerous for bigger businesses but it brings a new requirement for smaller businesses, where transactions previously fell below the limit. High value dealers can also expect to see this have a similar impact on the thresholds currently permitted for trades in cash.

Article 10 goes further and expands the requirement for the “gambling sector” to carry out due diligence on all transactions over 2,000 euro. This sees a significant expansion from the current directive which only applies to casinos. The expansion will cover many new entities which were previously exempt.

Conclusion

money laundering uae

The 4th anti money laundering directive was published in february 2013 and prescribed that member states have two years, until february 2015, to create domestic legislation to implement the changes. Given the relatively short time-scale which remains and the mention in the queen’s speech we will expect to hear much more in the next few months.

Although the government is not broadcasting the changes loudly, the proposals mean that corporate entities will need to take advice and consider their own individual requirements so that they will not be caught out when the legislation is introduced.

This article was written by jamas hodivala. The co-author was matthew ewens at blackfords LLP.

Category: blog | date: july 2014

Archives

• february 2018

• december 2017

• november 2017

• october 2017

• september 2017

• august 2017

• july 2017

• june 2017

• may 2017

• april 2017

money laundering uae

• march 2017

• february 2017

• january 2017

• december 2016

• november 2016

• october 2016

• september 2016

• august 2016

• july 2016

• june 2016

• may 2016

• april 2016

• march 2016

• february 2016

• january 2016

• december 2015

• november 2015

• october 2015

• september 2015

• august 2015

• july 2015

• june 2015

• may 2015

• april 2015

• march 2015

• february 2015

• january 2015

• december 2014

• november 2014

• october 2014

• september 2014

• august 2014

• july 2014

• june 2014

• may 2014

• april 2014

• march 2014

• february 2014

• january 2014

• december 2013

• november 2013

• october 2013

• september 2013

• august 2013

• july 2013

• june 2013

• may 2013

• april 2013

• march 2013

• february 2013

• january 2013

• december 2012

• november 2012

• october 2012

• september 2012

• august 2012

• july 2012

• june 2012

• may 2012

• april 2012

• march 2012

• february 2012

• january 2012

• december 2011

• november 2011

money laundering uae

• october 2011

• september 2011

• august 2011

• july 2011

• june 2011

• may 2011

• april 2011

• march 2011

• february 2011

• january 2011

• december 2010

• november 2010

• october 2010

• september 2010

• august 2010

• july 2010

• june 2010

• may 2010

• april 2010

• march 2010

• february 2010

• january 2010

• december 2009

• november 2009

• october 2009

• september 2009

• august 2009

• july 2009

• june 2009

• may 2009

• april 2009

• march 2009

• february 2009

• january 2009

• december 2008

• november 2008

• october 2008

• september 2008

• august 2008

• july 2008

• june 2008

• may 2008

• april 2008

• march 2008

• february 2008

• january 2008

• december 2007

• november 2007

• october 2007

• september 2007

• august 2007

• july 2007

• june 2007

• may 2007

• april 2007

• march 2007

• february 2007

• january 2007

• december 2006

• november 2006

• october 2006

• september 2006

• august 2006

• july 2006

• june 2006

• may 2006

money laundering uae

• april 2006

• march 2006

• february 2006

• january 2006

• december 2005

• november 2005

• october 2005

• september 2005

• august 2005

• july 2005

• june 2005

• may 2005

• april 2005

• march 2005

• february 2005

• january 2005