Secular politics – dr. subramanian swamy _ sharia _ religious conversion money laundering integration

Although religion is the private concern of individuals nevertheless the state should not enact laws or pursue policies in order to please religious orthodoxy and obscurantism. Instead I favour that the state create an atmosphere in which the people”s resilience and their power to adjust themselves to change, is strengthened. The state should enact laws which integrate society and promote a positive national outlook. Infact, the state should not be averse to legislating laws that conflict with religious orthodoxy. For example, we can never agree that a woman witness is not equal to man witness. (islamic law requires two women witness to counter a man”s evidence! ) the spirit of secularism is good,and is consistent with our hindu ethos.India”s experience with theocracy in history was only during the buddhist and mughal periods.Generally, hindu kings practiced the principle of secularism, different from the aggressive left and reactionary varieties.The state was pro-religion without bei ng d iscriminatory.Money laundering integration

at the present juncture of our history,the secularism conceptually needs therefore to be redefined in the ligh t of t he experience of the last nearly six decades of independe nce. Secularism thus cannot be used as a device to dissociate ourselves from the past, both good and bad.We must learn to cherish that which is glorious in our past, and learn from that which was shameful. Such a secularism is based on a commitment to the brotherhood of religious communities, on their respect for and pursuit of truth.

A controversy has however arisen so as to the formation of a uniform code relating to the family or personal law of the parties relating to matters such as marriage and divorce, succession adoption. The matter is however not complicated. As far as criminal code is concerned, it has already been coded in the indian penal code and criminal procedure code, and is applicable to all religious groups equally.In the civil code, a controversy has arisen regarding the adoption of a uniform code relating to the family or “personal law”of the parties relating to matters such as marriage and divorce, succession,adoption.Money laundering integration the framers of the constitution clearly indicated what they meant by the words “personal law” in entry 5 of list III of the 7th schedule of the same constitution.The framers of the constitution had in the constituent assembly made clear that in a secular state, personal laws relating to such matters as marrige, succession and inheritance could not depend upon religion, but must rest on a uniform civil code necessary for achieving the unity and solidarity of the nation. [K.M.Munshi,VII C,A.D.,547-48]. C.A.D=constituent assembly debate. Every time subsequently the question of uniform civil code was raised by anyone in parliament, the goverment of india opposed it on the ground that to achieve it would be to hurt muslim” sentiments” and that no implementation of this directive of the fundamental law could be made so long as the muslims themselves would not come forward to ask for it.Money laundering integration nevertheless, the supreme court has recommended, more than once, to take early steps towards the formation of a uniform civil code [mudgal v.Union of india (1995)3 S.C.C.635]. Entry 5 says: